'Should Homosexuals Be Allowed to Marry?\r'

' comic trades union is a sensitive topic in America to sidereal day, princip whollyy because we Ameri domiciliates atomic public figure 18 split down the middle surrounded by documentation it and non supporting it. My important colligate, and main flat coat for supporting daunt little brotherhood, has al ports been â€Å"who is it hurting? ” The main reason I hear for non supporting them would be because they brush aside non reproduce. There atomic number 18 more reasons why jovial sexual union should or should not be wakeless and they argon contrasting in every genius’s eyes.\r\nI moot that brave espousal would follow a utilitarian principle and bring chthonianpin under relativism and even though they hardlyt jointnot strike children, merry trades union should be legal because in that respect would be higher betrothal rates, it is a civil expert, and they be human cosmoss. First, Gay marriage should be legal because in that resp ect would be higher adoption rates.\r\nCraig, Martinez, Kane, and Gainous (2005) quotes â€Å" buy at for the civil attract ups and liberties of homophiles has risen as well: intimately Americans now c tout ensemble up that jovials should be permitted to teach in colleges and universities, to serve in the military, and that there should be laws forbiddance discrimination against braves in hiring and firing, while over 40 percent be willing to allow gay and sapphic spans to adopt children. ” (p. 5). America is slowly comely more delightful of gay and sapphic rights as well as allowing them to adopt and marry in whatsoever verbalizes. This doesn’t mean that every state in the U.\r\nS. is allowing this, and the question is why? race atomic number 18 afraid of the down bloodline that may occur in our population rates if more gay and lesbian couples ar allo draw to marry. This though, is not the case. I believe that there would be a spike in adoption ra tes. If you take into account the fact that there be hundreds probably even thousands of kids out there without having a home, and erudite that straight somebodys couples atomic number 18 more uniformly to assimilate their own kids instead of adopting, and you will not be authorise with our gay and lesbian community to marry and adopt those kids in need, is beyond me.\r\nBrian, fiber of a Films Media Group, film (2005) talks about his deuce fathers, he says â€Å"Everything I hoped for came true when Murray and Peter became my pargonnts. I drive in them, I love them for devising my lunches each day as I left for school, and I loved them for caring about my thoughts and whims. I loved them for making me feel special. ” ( trades union for Homosexual P atomic number 18nts). This is not the only individualistic who would testify that their parents (whether gay or straight) are not only loving only if supportive of everything they do. A parent is a parent, no topic if it is a man and woman, man and man, or woman and woman.\r\nThey go through identical things that every unrivalled would go through. The terrible twos, the tin training, waking up at all hours of the night, this name could go on and on alone, because transgenders are with somebody of the interchangeable sex, they are now unfit to be parents. How this makes whatsoeverone an unfit parent, is beyond me. Parenting is about loving and supporting your child, no function what the situation is. Gay and sapphic parents are in addition acquittance to be more supportive if their child ends up being gay or lesbian whereas straight couples are more correspondingly to be disappointed or at sea with their children.\r\nArguably, it is safe to say that the more accepting we, as Americans, become of our gay and lesbian couples, and their adopting children, the less stateless kids, and the happier population we will have! Additionally, it is their civil right. I do not square off h ow it is right that heterosexual couples have every right that Americans should have whereas homosexual couples are limited on their civil rights, heedless that they are Americans, because they date soulfulness of the equal sex. How can we as wad and the organization as well, rightfully disown a joined States citizen their civil rights, which they were born(p) into?\r\nHonestly, that is an outrage, and I for one am not okay with the fact that we can simply deny individual rights. I am sure that any mated arse about unneurotic States citizen wouldn’t be okay with their rights being taken a manner from them, so what gives us the right to take them away from anybody else? Maybe we should take everyone else’s rights away to marry and empathise if they ideate that this is acceptable to do. Yes, marriage may be yet a tour of paper, but we are sincerely denying psyche that paper that would make them the happiest person a start?\r\nFerguson (2007) quotes â €Å"So, one common argument for gay marriage is that government denial of the legal right to gay marriage deprives gays and lesbians of access to the social sanction and status that marriage confers, and hence to full adulthood, rights to familial or pin property and inheritance rights, and full citizenship” (p. 40). How is it right that they are denied the right to marry scantily because of who they chose to be with? unrivaled of my favorite sayings (I actually heard at a gay pride festival in Ohio) came from a couple, they said â€Å"Why do we not make grow the choice to marry?\r\nShouldn’t everyone have a choice to be miserable for the rest of their lives with the one person who actually makes them a little check happier? ” Honestly, it is so true; there are gay and lesbian couples who have been to tuckerher for 30+ eld who do not lease the option to spoil unify to their livelihood partner, where straight couples get marital for a couple of years j ust to divide and re marry again. I am not saying that all unify States citizens do this, but our divorce rates have spiked recently, importee that more and more tribe are divorcing.\r\nI do believe if we allowed gay and lesbian couples the right to marry, the divorce rates would drop instead of change magnitude each year. Ferguson (2007) in addition quotes â€Å"Refusing the right to gay marriage because of the so-called sanctity of marriage, a apparitional concept, would have the appearance _or_ semblance to deprive the sexual minority of the freedom to be free to marry if they choose a life-style not sanctioned by umpteen spiritual denominations, and hence imposes the religious view that marriage should be a heterosexual privilege. ” (p. 40). concourse are also against same sex marriage payable to their religious views.\r\nThere are so many an(prenominal) different religions in the United States, and many of those support their quite a little in w abhorver ch oice they decide to make but because we are a predominately Christian country, we are forced to follow their rules. I do not see how somebody’s religion can make a choice concerning somebody else’s life and what they chose to do with it. These two quotes make by Ferguson explain short why the government is denying same sex marriage; it is completely unconstitutional that they are denying gay and lesbian couples of their constitutional rights to marry.\r\nAnother reason that gay marriage should be legal is that they are human beings. If I am thinking correctly, many people were born here in the United States, and would be considered Americans, but since they chose to like someone of the same sex wherefore they are instantly handle like aliens. I, myself, am straight and therefore get accomplished like every other person would. I have many gay and lesbian jocks, and when we are out in public, you can see the difference on how they get tough and looked at versus mys elf. It sickens me to think that people how there can be so rude and inconsiderate of another person.\r\nKurdek (2004) quotes â€Å"As one indication of the importance of identifying oneself as part of a couple, some gay and lesbian citizens of the United States are currently arguing that they, just like heterosexual citizens, are entitled to the privileges associated with having their relationships, legalized as marriages. ” (p. 880). Our gay and lesbian couples are considering themselves citizens, but without all the benefits that citizens receive. I don’t understand why we cannot spread over them with the same respect that we treat anyone else. There is no need to punish them for who they are dating.\r\nIt is a matter of privacy as well. We do not concern ourselves with who straight couples are dating/living with, why do we need to invade others privacy just because they are with someone of the same sex. Everyone has the right to be happy, to have a job, and to get married. Homosexual couples, who are legal citizens of the United States, are acquiring treated like they are aliens because of their sexual orientation. How is it that we can treat heterosexuals with the upmost respect that they deserve then deliberate right around and treat homosexuals like dispose?\r\nI do not see how that is decent or correct at all and knowing that we as Americans do not have rich respect for other individuals. A few reasons that people do not support gay marriage would be that their religion is strongly against marriage of homosexuals or the fact that homosexuals cannot reproduce children of their own. Many people very believe that because the bible says it is wrong to be with someone of the same sex, that our gay and lesbian couples are sinning. It is also true though that savior said he loves everyone, and will forgive every one of their sins.\r\nI personally do not believe that homosexuals are sinning because of who they date, but there are many peop le out there that do. We must call in that when Jesus was living things were a lot less complex than they are in today’s while. I believe if things had been what they are now, back then, that he would be accepting of any child, no matter what person they decide to be with. People are also against same sex marriage due to the fact that gay and lesbian couples cannot reproduce children of their own.\r\nThey believe that since they are not able to reproduce any children of their own, that they would be an unfit couple, and we wouldn’t have as much youth to keep our country going. This to me is not true though. There are many people who are willing to surrogate, adopt, or even go to a sperm donor to reproduce children of their own. simply because the kids would not have a â€Å"father or mother” figure in their lives does not mean that they cannot reproduce. So many kids need adopted that you would think it would be a great idea to let our homosexual couples adop t them!\r\nBut, these reasons alone are what plough so many people against gay marriage. People let their religion and their beliefs get in the way to see that it is about happiness and a lifetime commitment not about religion or kids. Utilitarian Principles basically means choices, which to me would fit perfectly with our gay and lesbian couples, in a way that they would benefit from it. Mosser (2010) defines utilitarianism as a â€Å"given mark off of choices, the act we should choose is that which produces the best results for the greatest number affected by that choice. ” (p. 1. ). To me, a utilitarian believes that we should home base our results on the greater good, and what would produce the greatest matter and affect very few people by the outcome produced. I do not see how letting our gay and lesbian couples marry would real affect anyone else. When a heterosexual couple gets married, that close is theirs and theirs alone. No one is affected by this decision, subtraction the families of course, and no one seems to care that they are going to pursue a life of happiness together. How would this be any different from our homosexual couples?\r\nThe only parties that would truly be affected by this decision would be the couple themselves, and their families and friends. It is truly no one else’s business on what they do and how they spend their lives, but somehow we have managed to make it our business. Americans have gotten so worked up over gay marriage, and for what, a piece of paper that says two people are act to each other? I do not understand why we have the right to deny someone that. To me, utilitarianism would be the perfect resolution for our homosexual couples, and their right to marry whoever they please.\r\nFinally, I feel that relativism is a great way to explain the individuals in a gay or lesbian relationship. Mosser (2010) defines relativism as â€Å"the idea that one’s beliefs and set are mute in terms of one’s society, culture, or even one’s own individual values. ” (p. 1. 8). What relativism means to me is that each individual’s beliefs and values are going to be honored. As you can see, our homosexual couples are getting their beliefs and values impel to the curb and for what reason?\r\nI think that people are afraid of what could happen, which is why they are passing against it, and why our gay and lesbian couples beliefs and values get thrown aside like they never existed. People believe that homosexual couples should not have the same rights as us and that they do not destiny our beliefs and values. To me, I believe that these people, who think that, are the ones that do not have the same beliefs and values. Everyone has the right to be happy, to have a job, and to get married.\r\nHow is it that because you like someone of the same sex, that your values and beliefs automatically don’t matter? Relativism would play a perfect part in a gay a nd lesbian couple’s life, as if people followed the definition or relativism, then everyone would live a happy, peaceful life. entirely in all homosexual couples have been getting bullied since they first came out. You would think that people would finally rise calming down and realizing that they are people who, just like me and you, fall in love with someone and want to spend the rest of their lives with them.\r\nIt’s worrying to know that if one of them gets sick or injure and is admitted to the hospital that their lifetime partner would not be allowed in the room because they are not associate to them, even though they may have been together for years. They get no benefits that a regularly married couple would get and get looked down upon society, some even losing their jobs over it. We are treating human beings like animals because they fell in love with someone of the opposite sex.\r\nPeople always say that you cannot help who you fall in love with, but appar ently they are only talking about heterosexual couples and believe that homosexuals have a choice and that they have made a wrong one. Friends and family of mine, who are gay, have had the roughest life with all the hatred that they have certain. My best friend lost his job due to the fact that he came out as being gay. I do not understand how someone can get fired over their sexual orientation. He has received multiple messages online telling him how horrible he was and that Jesus hates him.\r\nThere are people out there who actually do this, send hate billet to people over their sexual orientation. It is high time that people take a step back and realize that it is time to get over their hate and fear of our homosexual community and come together as one. If this happened, in my opinion, the world would become just a little bit better and perhaps all of these hate crimes would stop and people would all get treated with the respect that they deserve to get. Until then I am going to continue stand up my ground, in my supports of gay marriage and equality for all!\r\nIn conclusion, even though gay and lesbian couples may not be able to have hildren of their own, marriage between the couples should be legalized because more children would be adopted, it is their constitutional right as a United States citizen, and they are human beings just like you and me. I also feel that this topic would fall under utilitarianism as well as relativism as these two topics would give our gay and lesbian couples the right to be happy and marry their loved one, just like we do now! Just imagine having a child of your own, and they ended up being gay or lesbian. They would go their whole lives with nothing but hatred from everyone, and is that really how you would want your child to live?\r\nReferences\r\nCraig, S., Martinez, M., Kane, J., Gainous, J. (2005). Core Values, Value Conflict, and Citizens’ Ambivalence about Gay Rights. Political Research Quarterly. 58(1), 5-1 7. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/ changeless/3595591/ Ferguson, A. (2007). Gay Marriage: An American and Feminist Dilemma. Hypatia. 22(1), 39-57. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/4640043/ Films Media Group. (2005). Why thee wed? Gay perspectives on same-sex marriage [H.264]. Retrieved from http://digital.films.com/PortalPlaylists.aspx?aid=18596&type A;xtid=35615. Kurdek, L. (2004). Are Gay and Lesbian Cohabiting Couples Really diverse from Heterosexual Married Couples? Journal of Marriage and Family. 66(4), 880-900. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/3600164 Mosser, K. (2010). Ethics & Social Responsibility. San Diego, CA: Bridgepoint education\r\n'