'Han China/Imperial Rome CCOT\r'

'Han mainland mainland mainland chinaware was one(a) of the longest dynasties in Chinese history, however, the imperial beard Roman empire lasted even longer. Han China and imperial capital of Italy share some(prenominal) similarities as considerably as legion(predicate) an(prenominal) differences. Although Han China and purplish capital of Italy had many similarities (patriarchy, elaborateness), the differences (recruit ment, arrangement of who is in authority) in methods of giving medicational run outweigh the similarities because of they had slender interaction with each other. The first similarity among Han China and gallant Rome is rig when comparing their time-worn societies.Both in Han China and Imperial Rome they were extremely patriarchal. In each society the man of the star sign could arrange marriages for their children, refractory whether or not to keep the offspring born to their wives, and decided how to punish wives if they commit a wrongdoing. In Han China, for example they tried to strengthen patriarchal authority by emphasizing immenseness of filial piety and women’s supremacy to men. Imperial Rome was similarly patriarchal, for example, because maintains would deplete multiple children with their wives in hope of giving stemma a strong, healthy son to fetch on the family name and legacy.The main chore given to women in Rome was to return sons. The women had no say in the second of children they had or in keeping the children they gave birth to. If the women couldn’t fulfill this expectation of having sons, the husband would divorce the woman, have children with another woman, or simply kill his wife and run a risk another one. The next similarity in the midst of Han China and Imperial Rome is the expansion of both their governments. Both societies sought to cover the borders of their empires through imperial expansion.They perceived threats to tribute direct to wars and conquests, which incr eased the length of borders and led to more perceived threats. In mineral vein of the Qin dynasty before the second empire, the primary finish of the Han dynasty was to unite all of China. To accomplish this, Han China invaded and brought the territories of Korea, Vietnam, and parts of modern Kyrgyzstan into Chinese society. Likewise, Imperial Rome conquered all of the Mediterranean lavabo and oversaw affairs from Anatolia and Palestine in the easternmost to Spain and Morocco in the west.Both societies in any case had vast armies to adjudge their new territories. Han China and Imperial Rome differed, firstly, in their forms of recruitment. In Han China, they needed meliorate officials to take positions in the society. To accomplish this, they created a university and civil service exams. The university they established was establish on Confucianism for its curriculum and was used to relieve oneself men for government service. The men also had to take civil service exams, whi ch plenty rarely passed, to become a government official.The recruitment for Imperial Rome was simpler. A typical recruit for the Roman multitude would appear at an interview with a letter of introduction, often written by the family patron. Next, they had to have a medical inquiry. The examination consisted of checking for a minimum height which was demanded and reservation sure the soldiers had all their fingers, toes, and limbs. After this was over, the men were given advanced pay and would be posted to a unit. Han China and Imperial Rome are different, secondly, because of who is in control of their government.Han China’s political system was known for a centralized unit, that was control by an emperor through the dominance of Heaven. Rome, however, had a centralized, interwoven structure that was govern by a Roman monarch, who controlled their complex structure. Furthermore, Han China was divided into administrative districts that were governed by officials, selec ted by the emperor. Though in contrast, Imperial Rome created a monarchy, disguised as a republic, so that the emperor could have complete control, but the citizens would feel equivalent they were contributing to the government.Han China and Imperial Rome were two very influential societies in history. They shared many similarities as well as many differences with each other. Han China and Imperial Rome had several differences, wish well recruitment and their systems of who is in authority, but they also had many similarities, such as world patriarchal and expansion, however their differences outweigh their similarities because they had little interaction with each other so they didn’t share ideas or concepts.\r\n'