Why was the civil war significant Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1000 words

Why was the civil contend significant - Essay ExampleOther than the cause or the objective which originally motivated the avocation and concretization of the well-behaved War, one could also look into matters of consequence from which to judge the grounds it is signified by. Pondering on the significance of U.S. Civil War bears the equivalent work of recounting the occurrences which essentially depict the post-war impact and which whitethorn be put together and labelled into what has since been known in U.S. History as reconstructive memory at the height of which could be found the tumultuous state of political affairs which not merely howling(a) the philosophy of the Radical Republicans from that of the Democrats but even shaped the fate of the liberatedmen, in the process. During the period of reconstruction (1865 - 1877) peculiarly with respect to the early years of its commencement by the persistent rule of Congress that was then principally composed of the Radicals, the federal government experienced yet another severe case of division amidst the two dominant political parties. On one hand, the Radical Republicans who had become accustomed to dealing with the release of slavery conveyed the desire for implementing Reconstruction policies in a manner that would materialize a vision in which Equality of opportunity created a more fluid social structure as exemplified via the model of free individuals, competing equally in the labor market and enjoying equal political rights (Faragher et al, 464). On the contrary, however, Pres. Andrew Johnson who belonged to the Democratic Party oppose such visionary scheme by augmenting the powers of civil governments in the South as well as replacing certain military officials with a commanding staff that seemed less likely persuaded in go on the cause of the blacks especially in matters concerning suffrage ( wheeler et al, 310). Before the Civil War broke out and by the time it took place, factions generally e xisted between the federal North and the confederate South but after the try of martial skills, bloodshed, and the taste of several deaths came another era that would eventually justify whether or not the Civil War deserved to be treated with significance. Apparently, through these factions narrowed within the political domains of the federal government, Reconstruction served as a projection of Civil War or the rebirth of a principle which resembled a test by fire designed to refine and determine whose spirits remained driven and sincere in defending the great original cause. This became evident the moment when the Moderates and the Radicals of Republicans united to form a single broad force in the House of Representatives aimed at impeaching Johnson whom they charged heavily for violating the Tenure of Office Act in spite of the truth that the presidents removal from office was due to his intense opposition toward the policies of congressional Reconstruction which the Republicans could not afford to take any longer (466). Through the victory of the Radical Republicans, Reconstruction Acts triumphed over those of Restoration which Johnson attempted to promulgate during his effective term. Hence, with zeal kept on continuing to farm the core ideals of the Civil War, the Republicans managed to enable the Congressional Reconstruction to establish the Freedmens Bureau which, according to the findings of Wheeler and company, was given additional federal support to set up schools for African Americans, negotiate labor contracts, and with the military, serve well monitor elections